USCIS No Longer Affording Deference to I-129-based NIV Extensions

For over 10 years, USCIS has taken the approach that, when adjudicating extension petitions involving the same employer, the same beneficiary, and the same underlying facts, its adjudicators would defer to prior approval determinations. USCIS has now reversed this policy, interpreting it as placing an extra burden on the agency to find and compare an old petition to an extension and shifting the burden of proof to USCIS when that burden lies with the petitioner. Moving forward, USCIS officers will be treating all extensions as independent and new filings, even though promulgated regulations do not require supporting documents in many kinds of nonimmigrant extension cases. In its announcement, USCIS also stated that it does not want its adjudicators to rely on previous determinations at all, as it may have the unintended consequences of missing material defects in prior petitions.

Published by
Palmer Polaski PC

Recent Posts

Provisional Unlawful Presence Waivers: Still a Good Backup Option

While the Keeping Family’s Together Program remains on hold, many eligible applicants would be wise…

1 week ago

Keeping Families Together Program Updates

On August 19, 2024, DHS began accepting applications for the Biden Administration’s new “Keeping Families…

2 weeks ago

News in Brief

Illegal Entries at Southern Border Significantly Down: Illegal entries, based on border arrests, were lower…

3 weeks ago

New Associate Attorney!

Introducing Surina Techarukpong, our newest member of the Palmer Polaski team. Surina, an associate attorney, was a…

3 weeks ago

How to Lose U.S. Permanent Residency

Lawful permanent residents (LPRs) in the United States, i.e.,  green card holders, enjoy many benefits…

2 months ago

SCOTUS Rules on U.S. Citizen’s Rights to Challenge Spousal Visas Denials

In Department of State v. Muñoz, the United States Supreme Court issued a disappointing 6-3…

2 months ago