Supreme Court Holds Gender-Based Distinction for Acquisition of Citizenship Is Unconstitutional

The Supreme Court found unconstitutional the gender-based distinction in the immigration act, requiring a shorter period of parental physical presence in the U.S. for acquisition of citizenship through an unwed citizen mother versus an unwed citizen father. Rather than extending the shorter period of required physical presence to children of unwed citizen fathers, or the longer period to unwed citizen mothers, the Justices said that it was up to Congress, rather than the Court, to act on the issue.

Published by
Palmer Polaski PC

Recent Posts

Student Visa Policy Update

On August 27, 2024, USCIS issued a Policy Alert regarding F-1 students, clarifying various course-related…

7 days ago

Provisional Unlawful Presence Waivers: Still a Good Backup Option

While the Keeping Family’s Together Program remains on hold, many eligible applicants would be wise…

3 weeks ago

Keeping Families Together Program Updates

On August 19, 2024, DHS began accepting applications for the Biden Administration’s new “Keeping Families…

4 weeks ago

News in Brief

Illegal Entries at Southern Border Significantly Down: Illegal entries, based on border arrests, were lower…

1 month ago

New Associate Attorney!

Introducing Surina Techarukpong, our newest member of the Palmer Polaski team. Surina, an associate attorney, was a…

1 month ago

How to Lose U.S. Permanent Residency

Lawful permanent residents (LPRs) in the United States, i.e.,  green card holders, enjoy many benefits…

2 months ago